ACTION at its Best!

Snorzac · December 19, 2008, 09:21:24 AM

Here is the front fleet numbers on BUS-389 a brand new MAN 18.310 CNG, or should I say BUS-38?

BUS-758 a Mark I Renault PR100.2 in AOA with some rather cheap rear panel replacement.

Buzz Killington · December 19, 2008, 11:13:00 AM

lol, good ol' ACTION

758 isnt really their fault though. I doubt they'd have any of the green "sticker" sheeting to replace the back with, and Buspak or whoever it is that does ACTION's advertising lately would need to send a guy out to replace it.

Snorzac · December 19, 2008, 11:16:03 AM

Still looks pretty bad but I do agree with you

Buzz Killington · December 19, 2008, 11:38:58 AM

yeah, does look dodgy. ACTION dont seem to take as much pride in the fleet these days.

The MAN's look crap with that CB60 lettering right next to the fleet numbers too.

Barry Drive · December 20, 2008, 12:47:19 PM

BTW: there should not be an apostrophe in the "its" in the title of this subject. Simple rule: "it's" means "it is" - otherwise use "its".

Buzz Killington · December 20, 2008, 01:18:48 PM

I can't believe I missed that - apostrophes where they should not be is one of my big irritants.

bubzie · December 20, 2008, 06:11:04 PM

its an apostrophe catastrophe!

http://www.apostrophecatastrophes.com/

:)

CanberraTransport · December 21, 2008, 04:59:18 PM

Quote from: Mr Snrub on December 20, 2008, 01:18:48 PM
I can't believe I missed that - apostrophes where they should not be is one of my big irritants.

Shouldn't that be ARE, not "is"? lol

Busnerd · December 21, 2008, 05:22:21 PM

I think you could only use are if he had said biggest not big...