Started by Barry Drive, July 13, 2019, 11:02:42 am
0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.
Quote from: Barry Drive on July 13, 2019, 11:02:42 am70 & 71 - resume route along Tuggeranong Pky instead of Namatjira Drive
Quote from: ajw373 on July 13, 2019, 04:40:57 pmIf you scrap the R3 how are you going to provide sufficent frequency with R2/R4 to meet demand between Belconnen and the City?
Quote from: Barry Drive on July 13, 2019, 11:02:42 amR6 - Chapman to COC - current R7 to Weston then Woden, Canberra Hospital, Goyder St to COC (* with transfers to 52 & 53 on Goyder St/Red Hill terminus)
Quote from: Barry Drive on July 13, 2019, 11:02:42 amR10 - converted to peak only
Quote from: Barry Drive on July 13, 2019, 11:02:42 am56 - some sort of Fyshwick loop (not yet worked out)
Quote from: Barry Drive on July 13, 2019, 11:02:42 am180 & 181 travel via Tuggeranong Interchange to provide direct City to Tuggeranong route in peak
Quote from: Barry Drive on July 13, 2019, 11:02:42 am193 - City to Erindale via Adelaide Av, Yarra Glen, Yamba Dr & Erindale Dr
Quote from: King of Buses on July 13, 2019, 06:22:10 pmTuggeranong - Chisholm - Hume - COC - Fyshwick - Airport service, maybe?
Quote from: Sylvan Loves Buses on July 13, 2019, 05:43:19 pmWhat demand? The R4 is every 5-15 minutes. B to C patrons are so spoiled at the moment, how do you think the T to W patrons feel losing most of their suburban direct to Woden routes?
Quote from: triumph on July 16, 2019, 11:06:13 pmPassenger loadings to determine availability and frequency is not the point. The issue is that the service is there when it is needed, so that public transport in lieu of relying on car ownership becomes a real option.If loadings were to be the determining factor, then it is far too soon to draw conclusions. It will take years for people to come to recognise and rely on a frequent, reliable service. Meanwhile it is essential for success of the current network philosophy and its long term future to stick to it and tough it out.
Quote from: Northside on July 15, 2019, 10:17:03 pmI like the idea of scrapping the rapid routes through suburbia. They are in no way rapid and probably don't justify the frequency. I'd have thought you'd still need to keep the r10 and r3 to the airport to encourage growth although you can probably make the r3 a loop service and not run through BP twice. Save a heap of dead running.
Quote from: King of Buses on July 13, 2019, 06:22:10 pmI'm not convinced I like this one. From what I can tell, the R6 is heavily used by people for travel from Woden to Manuka/Kingston. Having said that, I do like the removal of the duplication of the R6 and suburban routes between the City and Kingston/Manuka, the reinstatement of a Woden to Fyshwick link, and the new Weston Creek to CBR Hospital link. Also, unsure if the Chapman to Weston needs to be a Rapid still.
Quote from: Northside on August 03, 2019, 06:23:56 pmR1: Gungahlin to City - unchanged
Quote from: Northside on August 03, 2019, 06:23:56 pm71: ... - Woden ... section removed.
Quote from: Sylvan Loves Buses on August 03, 2019, 07:45:13 pmFYI the Woden CIT isn't a CIT anymore, hasn't been since mid-2017. It's just a childcare centre and a free-parking area now. It was suppose to be knocked down, but we all know how fun asbestos is to play with yay!Aw I was hoping you'd add a detour to that No comment
Quote from: Sylvan Loves Buses on August 04, 2019, 10:29:32 pmI think there would just be a lot of uproar with a lack of a Woden bound service for all the east Kambah patrons.