ACT Bus - Get on Board
Website | Forum | Gallery | Fleet Wiki | Retired Employees Club | Follow us on Twitter | Like us on Facebook

Author Topic: General Fleet Discusson  (Read 5415 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Offline triumph

  • *****
  • Posts: 59
  • Gender: Male
  • Newbie
Re: General Fleet Discusson
« Reply #100 on: April 13, 2017, 11:04:19 PM »
Two questions.
1. Am I right in assuming the vertically alternating NEXT and STOP is unique to bus343?
2. Buses 343 and 344 are shown in the fleet list as having the name 'Sigourney' - which one is actually Sigourney?

Offline Sylvan Loves Buses

  • *****
  • Posts: 594
  • Gender: Male
  • wait what?
Re: General Fleet Discusson
« Reply #101 on: April 14, 2017, 02:56:06 AM »
1. Yes
2. 343 is Sigourney, 344 is Baldrick

Offline Barry Drive

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Gender: Male
  • Male, middle-class and white (YDK what it's like)
Re: General Fleet Discusson
« Reply #102 on: April 14, 2017, 02:41:30 PM »
2. Buses 343 and 344 are shown in the fleet list as having the name 'Sigourney' - which one is actually Sigourney?
Thank you. Error has been corrected.

Offline Barry Drive

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Gender: Male
  • Male, middle-class and white (YDK what it's like)
Re: General Fleet Discusson
« Reply #103 on: May 02, 2017, 06:58:37 PM »
With the latest withdrawals, we've now passed a milestone: there are fewer than 100 Renaults remaining in service.

Offline triumph

  • *****
  • Posts: 59
  • Gender: Male
  • Newbie
Re: General Fleet Discusson
« Reply #104 on: May 02, 2017, 11:15:02 PM »
Renault PR100.2 Mkll are shown under fleet in the Transport Canberra site as having standoing capacity of 27 whereas the figure displayed on the rear of buses looked at is 26.

A typo, a carryover from an earlier model, a change during the model run, or ...........

A minor detail and I assume the legally required  display of the figure on the bus is the correct one,

ACT Bus Forum

Re: General Fleet Discusson
« Reply #104 on: May 02, 2017, 11:15:02 PM »

Offline Barry Drive

  • Administrator
  • *****
  • Posts: 3411
  • Gender: Male
  • Male, middle-class and white (YDK what it's like)
Re: General Fleet Discusson
« Reply #105 on: May 20, 2017, 03:46:51 PM »
A carryover from the Mk1, as far as I can tell. (Mk1 were 42 seated and 27 standing whereas Mk2 are 43 seated and 26 standing.)

The fleetwiki Fleet Specifications page has been updated to include the full capacity (where known). At the moment, we don't have the number for the Renault artics, but might find something in the photo gallery.

Offline Sylvan Loves Buses

  • *****
  • Posts: 594
  • Gender: Male
  • wait what?
Re: General Fleet Discusson
« Reply #106 on: May 20, 2017, 07:25:04 PM »
The 180 artics total capacity was 110 on both Mks

Offline triumph

  • *****
  • Posts: 59
  • Gender: Male
  • Newbie
Re: General Fleet Discusson
« Reply #107 on: May 20, 2017, 08:31:30 PM »
Thanks for capacity data info and for wiki update to include that. (Had suspected the Renault Mk 1 capacities had been shown by TC for the Mk 11.)


Offline King of Buses

  • Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 1260
  • Gender: Male
  • Gallifrey Falls No More
Re: General Fleet Discusson
« Reply #108 on: May 20, 2017, 09:56:39 PM »
At the moment, we don't have the number for the Renault artics, but might find something in the photo gallery.

According to one of the few photos of PR180.2s I have where capacity data is visible/clear enough to read...

PR180.2 MkI (With Luggage Rack) Total Capacity: 110; 61 seated/41 standing (based of 725)
PR180.2 MkI (Without Luggage Rack) Total Capacity: 110; 65 seated/45 standing (based of 726)
PR180.2 MkII Total Capacity: 110; 69 seated/41 standing (based off 986)

(This is subject to buses displaying the correct data which isn't always the case even in the current fleet...)

Online Busfanatic101

  • *****
  • Posts: 444
  • Gender: Male
  • Mission: To ride & photograph every ACTION bus
Re: General Fleet Discusson
« Reply #109 on: May 20, 2017, 11:02:08 PM »
PR180.2 MkI (With Luggage Rack) Total Capacity: 110; 61 seated/41 standing (based of 725)

(This is subject to buses displaying the correct data which isn't always the case even in the current fleet...)


Except 61+41≠102. Perhaps the other 8 could fit on the roof?

Offline Sylvan Loves Buses

  • *****
  • Posts: 594
  • Gender: Male
  • wait what?
Re: General Fleet Discusson
« Reply #110 on: May 21, 2017, 02:09:05 AM »
(This is subject to buses displaying the correct data which isn't always the case even in the current fleet...)

And of course, those are stickers which can be pealed or wear off over time.

Offline King of Buses

  • Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 1260
  • Gender: Male
  • Gallifrey Falls No More
Re: General Fleet Discusson
« Reply #111 on: May 21, 2017, 09:58:39 AM »

Except 61+41≠102. Perhaps the other 8 could fit on the roof?

While we're in the mood for typos, you'll find 61+41 does in fact equal 102, despite what you say there...  :P

What it doesn't equal is the 110 I said it did, and that's because I was meant to say 61 seated/49 standing for that model (must've had the Mark II on the mind).

Online Busfanatic101

  • *****
  • Posts: 444
  • Gender: Male
  • Mission: To ride & photograph every ACTION bus
Re: General Fleet Discusson
« Reply #112 on: May 21, 2017, 07:50:20 PM »
While we're in the mood for typos, you'll find 61+41 does in fact equal 102, despite what you say there...  :P

What it doesn't equal is the 110 I said it did, and that's because I was meant to say 61 seated/49 standing for that model (must've had the Mark II on the mind).
I did mean to write 61+41≠110, so it wasn't a typo, just had the actual calculation in my mind when I typed it. I did notice my error but that was a moment after I pressed post

Offline King of Buses

  • Contributor
  • *****
  • Posts: 1260
  • Gender: Male
  • Gallifrey Falls No More
Re: General Fleet Discusson
« Reply #113 on: May 21, 2017, 08:33:29 PM »
I did mean to write 61+41≠110, so it wasn't a typo, just had the actual calculation in my mind when I typed it. I did notice my error but that was a moment after I pressed post
#relatable

Sent from my SM-T330 using Tapatalk